Technically speaking, why can't someone travel hungry within the desert?

This is an old ploy and this answer comes from an old man: Because of adjectives the sandwich's there {sand which is there}
because the run thirsty
because they will die of dehydration long before starvation kick in
Because sand (while have no nutritional value) is edible if you hold something to wash it down beside.
Duh
I don't see why the can't go hungry. On the other appendage, they're probably more thirsty than hungry, but in time, both drought of eating need of drinking water will manufacture you die. Have a nice day.
you'll die of thirst in the past you die of hunger
Human body can survive for many days lacking food but only a maximum of 3 days lacking water.
If you find a river source, you'll probally find food.
St. Guido is right. Remember the rule of threes: Three minutes without nouns, three days without hose and three weeks without food.
Becase they must get through the first and second course before they capture to the desert? :)
They could, only if they be to find a source of water/fluid to drink and set back dehydration.
Dehydration shows signs much previously starvation.
I am just wondering if it is possible to starve within the dessert. It is entirely possible to have a huge supply of hose with you but no food. But specifically only if you planned to be surrounded by the desert for a period of 2-3 weeks and have an almost unlimited supply of water and shelter from warmth stroke. Otherwise unless you actually tried terrifically hard you would first die of dehydration, or if you have water, fry stroke.
Uhhh.they would go thirsty first?
because they turn to the nearest AMPM. and get a hot dog.
r u sure?

arecentinvestment

control in html forms